Geometry
Assessment
BRE 209 criteria: VSC ≥ 27%, or retained ≥ 0.8 × existing- VSC unobstructed
- —
- VSC existing
- —
- VSC proposed
- —
- Retained ratio
- —
- Obstruction angle — existing
- —
- Obstruction angle — proposed
- —
Section
Obstruction angles measured at the window centreCompliant height envelope
Maximum proposed height at each distance that still retains the BRE criteria| Distance m | Max height for VSC 27% | Max height for 0.8× retained | Governing limit | Note |
|---|
Method and limits
VSC is computed by numerical integration of the CIE standard overcast sky over the sky hemisphere visible from the window centre. Sky luminance follows L(θ) = Lz(1 + 2 sin θ)/3 for altitude θ, and illuminance on the vertical plane is integrated as ∫∫ L(θ) cos θ cos φ · cos θ dθ dφ over azimuth φ = ±90° from the window normal, with the lower altitude limit set by the obstruction in that direction. The result is expressed as a percentage of the unobstructed horizontal illuminance under the same sky, which gives 39.6% for a fully unobstructed vertical window — the accepted reference value, and a check that the integration is right.
BRE Site Layout Planning for Daylight and Sunlight (BR 209) treats a window as adequately lit if the VSC is at least 27%, or, where it falls below that, if the proposed value is at least 0.8 of the existing value. Both tests are applied here. Failing them is not automatically a refusal — it is the trigger for a fuller daylight assessment and a planning judgement.
This is a screening calculation, not a formal assessment. It models a single rectangular obstruction of uniform height at one distance, measured at the window centre; it does not handle stepped or irregular massing, multiple separate obstructions, balconies, overhangs, window reveals, reflected light from surrounding surfaces, or internal room geometry. A formal BRE assessment uses Waldram diagrams or validated software, and considers No Sky Line, Average Daylight Factor and Annual Probable Sunlight Hours alongside VSC. Rights to light as a legal matter is separate again and is assessed on Radiance-based adequacy, not on VSC.
Lockwood & Wallace Ltd · Tools Repository · All computation runs locally in this browser.