50 TOOLS LIVE · 8 OMAINTEC TRACKS · FREE

The O&M blueprint,
made executable.

A general-purpose chatbot will give you a plausible paragraph about pavement deterioration. It will not give you the decay curve for your climate, your axle loads and your structural number — with the treatment window, the deferral penalty and the cost per square metre attached.

These fifty tools do. Each one carries a named method, a stated standard and real backend logic. They run in your browser, on your data, for nothing.

om-invasion / live PCI 74 → 55 inΔσ fatigue DWebster cycleSL achievedNPV @ 7% 3 yrs0.41296 sSL 1$18.4m ENERGYWATERASSETSCYBER 5 tools5 tools10 tools5 tools
ASTM D6433 PCIEN 1993-1-9 fatigueIEC 61850-5 timingISO 55001 clause gapWebster optimum cycleJoukowsky surgeIEC 62443 SL-AWeibull β / ηFEM 1.001 duty classISO 9223 corrosivityEU EED Art.26AHP consistency ratioMonte Carlo sparesORAT readinessISO 12944 coating lifeGHG Protocol Scope 1 & 2ASTM D6433 PCIEN 1993-1-9 fatigueIEC 61850-5 timingISO 55001 clause gapWebster optimum cycleJoukowsky surgeIEC 62443 SL-AWeibull β / ηFEM 1.001 duty classISO 9223 corrosivityEU EED Art.26AHP consistency ratioMonte Carlo sparesORAT readinessISO 12944 coating lifeGHG Protocol Scope 1 & 2
0Tools, all free
0OMAINTEC tracks covered
0Regions — ME, EU, Asia, Africa
0Bytes of your data uploaded
Why this exists

Standard prompts fall short where the engineering starts

Governmental authorities, mega-project developers and large industrial corporations do not fail at O&M for lack of general advice. They fail at the point where a decision needs a defensible number — and that number needs a domain framework, a regulatory model, and operational logic that a conversational answer cannot carry.

01 / METHOD

A named method, not a narrative

Every tool states the method it runs — Webster's optimum cycle, median-rank Weibull regression, the Joukowsky equation, Saaty's eigenvector weights — so the result can be checked line by line, and defended in a review where someone disagrees with it.

02 / STANDARD

Tied to the code that governs

Results reference the standard that decides them: ASTM D6433, EN 1993-1-9, IEC 62443-3-3, ISO 55001, FEM 1.001, ISO 12944. Where a threshold is breached the tool names the clause, not a sentiment.

03 / PRIVACY

Nothing leaves the browser

Single-file, client-side applications. No backend, no database, no upload. That is what makes them usable on a client's own survey data on day one, without a procurement conversation about where the data goes.

The library

Fifty tools, mapped to the eight OMAINTEC tracks

Forty tools sit across the conference's eight core tracks. Ten more address cross-regional mega-infrastructure problems that do not fit a single track — Gulf corrosion, African rural microgrids, European district heating, Asian flood drainage, cross-border rail, port cranes and national asset registers.

How a tool works

Point, click, and get something you can put in a report

INPUT

Fields that match your survey sheet

Each tool asks for what you already hold — a PCI score, a strain reading, an SDI figure, a point list, a failure-time series. Defaults are realistic, so you can see the logic working before you touch anything.

OUTPUT

Assessment, numbers, chart, table, actions

A written verdict in plain language, six headline metrics with pass/fail colouring, a chart, a detail table, and a short list of what to do next. Export to CSV, print it, or copy a structured brief into your own document.

LIMITS

Stated, not hidden

Where a result depends on an assumption that matters — alpha factor, detail category, discount rate, emission factor — the tool says so and tells you what it would take to measure it properly rather than estimate it.

REVIEW

An engineer still signs

These tools do the arithmetic, the index conversions, the option sweeps and the compliance checks. They do not take responsibility for the outcome. A qualified engineer reviews and signs; the tool never does.

The paid layer

The tools are free because they are the part that can be given away. What cannot be automated is knowing which authority is about to issue, what the evaluator actually scores, which credential gap will disqualify you at prequalification, and how to write the technical submission that survives the panel. That is the engagement.

Tell us the contract you are chasing.

We will tell you honestly whether it is winnable for you, what the gap is, and what it would take to close it — before anyone discusses a fee.

Honest limits

What these tools are not

Not a substitute for site data

A deterioration curve built on one condition survey is a hypothesis. Two surveys make it a rate. The tools say which inputs carry the result so you know what to go and measure.

Not a design authority

They size, screen, rank and check. They do not produce an issued design, and no output here should be construed as a certified calculation.

Not connected to anything

No live feeds, no integrations, no stored sessions. If a tool needs your SCADA history, you paste the series in — and it stays in the tab.